EVAPORATION AS A CAUSE OF POSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN CELL PLATING AND GROWTH IN MICROTITER PLATESMARTUZA RL; PROFFITT MR; MOORE MB et al.1976; TRANSPLANTATION; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 21; NO 9; PP. 271-273; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

CR. RELEASING CYTOTOXICITY TESTS: STUDY OF PARAMETERS INFLUENCING THEIR RELIABILITYGABRILOVAC J; BORANIC M; RADACIC M et al.1976; Z. IMMUN.-FORSCH.; DTSCH.; DA. 1976; VOL. 151; NO 1; PP. 3-12; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

IN VITRO STUDIES ON CELL-MEDIATED CYTOTOXICITY BY MEANS OF A TERMINAL LABELING TECHNIQUEMORE R; YRON I; BEN SASSON S et al.1975; CELL. IMMUNOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 15; NO 2; PP. 382-391; BIBL. 15REF.Article

SERA FROM IRRADIATED RABBITS AS A SOURCE OF COMPLEMENT FOR IMMUNE CYTOLYSIS ASSAYS.WALKER WS; MILLS B; MOHANAKUMAR T et al.1975; TRANSPLANTATION; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 20; NO 3; PP. 260-262; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

CYTOTOXIC ACTIVITY OF LYMPHOCYTES. III. STANDARDIZATION OF MEASUREMENT OF CELL-MEDIATED LYSISLUCAS ZJ; WALKER SM.1974; J. IMMUNOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 113; NO 1; PP. 209-224; BIBL. 48REF.Article

CYTOTOXIC TESTING AND LEUKOCYTE INCREASE AS AN INDEX TO FOOD SENSITIVITYULETT GA; PERRY SG.1974; ANN. ALLERGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 33; NO 1; PP. 23-32; BIBL. 1P.Article

A MODIFIED ⁵¹CR RELEASE ASSAY FOR CYTOTOXIC LYMPHOCYTESDUNKLEY M; MILLER RG; SHORTMAN K et al.1974; J. IMMUNOL. METHODS; NETHERL.; DA. 1974; VOL. 6; NO 1-2; PP. 39-51; BIBL. 7REF.Article

A SENSITIVE IN VITRO MICROASSAY FOR DETECTING ANTIBODY-DEPENDENT CELLULAR CYTOTOXICITY. POSSIBLE ROLE IN MONITORING LYMPHOCYTE FUNCTIONZIGHELBOIM J; GALE RP; OSSORIO RC et al.1974; TRANSPLANTATION; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 18; NO 1; PP. 27-30; BIBL. 11REF.Article

SOME METHODOLOGICAL STUDIES ON EFFECTOR CELLS IN THE LYMPHOCYTE-DEPENDENT CYTOTOXIC ANTIBODY ASSAYWERNER C; EUGSTER M; KLOUDA PT et al.1976; J. IMMUNOL. METHODS; NETHERL.; DA. 1976; VOL. 10; NO 2-3; PP. 279-288; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

A METHOD OF MEASURING ANTIBODY- AND PHYTOHAEMAGGLUTININ-INDUCED LYMPHOCYTE-DEPENDENT CYTOTOXICITY USING WHOLE BLOOD = UNE METHODE POUR MESURER LA CYTOTOXICITE DEPENDANT DES LYMPHOCYTES INDUITE PAR ANTICORPS ET PAR PHA EN UTILISANT DU SANG TOTALGALE D; MACLENNAN ICM.1976; CLIN. EXPER. IMMUNOL.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 23; NO 2; PP. 252-257; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

CELLULAR MICROCYTOTOXICITY IN HUMAN TUMOR SYSTEMS: ANALYSIS OF RESULTSOLDHAM RK; DJEU JY; CANNON GB et al.1975; J. NATION. CANCER INST.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 55; NO 6; PP. 1305-1318; BIBL. 40 REF.Article

PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH STUDY OF CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY TO HUMAN TUMORS BY MICROCYTOTOXICITY ASSAYSHERBERMAN RB; OLDHAM RK.1975; J. NATION. CANCER INST.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 55; NO 4; PP. 749-753; BIBL. 1 P.Article

PROBIT ANALYSIS OF CYTOTOXICITY DATAPAPERMASTER BW.1974; TRANSPLANTATION; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 18; NO 6; PP. 541-544; BIBL. 12REF.Article

A NEW RADIOISOTOPIC MICROASSAY OF CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY UTILIZING TECHNETIUM-99M LABELED TARGET CELLS = UNE NOUVELLE MICRO-REACTION RADIO-ISOTOPIQUE D'IMMUNITE A MEDIATION CELLULAIRE UTILISANT DES CELLULES-CIBLES MARQUEES PAR TECHNETIUM 99MGILLESPIE GY; BARTH RF; GOBUTY A et al.1973; PROC. SOC. EXPER. MED.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 142; NO 2; PP. 378-382; BIBL. 24REF.Serial Issue

SECONDARY CYTOTOXIC CELL RESPONSE TO LYMPHOCYTIC CHORIOMENINGITIS VIRUS. I. KINETICS OF INDUCTION IN VITRO AND YIELDS OF EFFECTOR CELLSDUNLOP MBC; BLANDEN RV.1976; IMMUNOLOGY; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 31; NO 2; PP. 171-180; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

PROBLEMS IN THE CLINICAL USE OF THE MICROCYTOTOXICITY ASSAY FOR MEASURING CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY TO TUMOR CELLSHEPPNER G; HENRY E; STOLBACH L et al.1975; CANCER RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 35; NO 8; PP. 1931-1937; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

DER CELLULAERE CYTOTOXISCHE TEST IN DER TUMORIMMUNOLOGIE = L'EPREUVE DE CYTOTOXICITE CELLULAIRE DANS L'IMMUNOLOGIE DES TUMEURSPEES HW.1975; KLIN. WSCHR.; DTSCH.; DA. 1975; VOL. 53; NO 1; PP. 1-6; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ⁵¹CR RELEASE RELEASE CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY FOR CYTOTOXIC LYMPHOCYTESMILLER RG; DUNKLEY M.1974; CELL. IMMUNOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 14; NO 2; PP. 284-302; BIBL. 21REF.Article

A DOUBLE-ISOTOPE TECHNIQUE FOR CYTOTOXICITY ASSAYZOLA H; PALMER RMJ.1974; J. IMMUNOL. METHODS; NETHERL.; DA. 1974; VOL. 6; NO 1-2; PP. 133-139; BIBL. 8REF.Article

MONOLAYER CULTURES OF TRANSPLANTABLE TUMORS FOR CYTOTOXICITY TESTS IN VITRO = CULTURE EN COUCHE MONOCELLULAIRE DE TUMEURS TRANSPLANTABLES POUR L'EXECUTION DES TESTS DE CYTOTOXICITE IN VITROLANDOLFO S.1973; G. BATTERIOL. VIROL. IMMUNOL., 1; ITAL.; DA. 1973; VOL. 66; NO 7-12; PP. 190-193; BIBL. 6REF.Article

A MICROASSAY FOR THE QUANTITATION OF CYTOTOXIC ANTITUMOR ANTIBODY: USE OF 125I-IODODEOXYURIDINE AS A TUMOR CELL LABEL = UN MICRODOSAGE POUR LA QUANTIFICATION DES ANTICORPS ANTITUMORAUX CYTOTOXIQUES: UTILISATION D'IODODESOXYURIDINE-125I COMME MARQUEUR DES CELLULES TUMORALESLEMEVEL BP; WELLS SA JR.1973; J. NATION. CANCER INST.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 50; NO 3; PP. 803-806; BIBL. 5REF.Serial Issue

SECONDARY CYTOTOXIC CELL RESPONSE TO LYMPHOCYTIC CHORIOMENINGITIS VIRUS. II. NATURE AND SPECIFICITY OF EFFECTOR CELLSDUNLOP MBC; DOHERTY PC; ZINKERNAGEL RM et al.1976; IMMUNOLOGY; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 31; NO 2; PP. 181-186; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

IMMUNOCOMPETENT CELLS IN MAN. III. THE KILLER CELL ACTIVITY OF NORMAL CIRCULATING LYMPHOCYTESBEHELAK Y; RICHTER M.1975; CLIN. IMMUNOL. IMMUNOPATHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 4; NO 2; PP. 286-290; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

IN VITRO ASSAYS OF CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY TO HUMAN SOLID TUMORS: PROBLEMS OF QUANTITATION, SPECIFICITY, AND INTERPRETATIONBALDWIN RW.1975; J. NATION. CANCER INST.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 55; NO 4; PP. 745-748; BIBL. 39 REF.Article

ANTIBODY-DEPENDENT HUMAN LYMPHOCYTOTOXICITY: A MICRO ASSAY SYSTEMZEIJLEMAKER WP; ROOS MTL; SCHELLEKENS PTA et al.1975; EUROP. J. IMMUNOL.; GERM.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 8; PP. 579-584; BIBL. 26 REF.Article